Justice Department Charges Two More in White House UFC Attack Plot
Justice Department charges two more in alleged – The Justice Department has charged two additional individuals in an alleged plot to attack a UFC event at the White House. This development follows the initial arrests of key suspects, expanding the scope of the investigation into a potential security threat. The new charges indicate the group had advanced preparations for the attack, according to recent legal documents. One of the accused, Jordan Rincker, was arrested at his mother’s home in Missouri, where he claimed to have “armed a terrorist,” as outlined in the latest criminal complaint. This marks a significant escalation in the case, which now includes more suspects and a clearer picture of the group’s intentions.
Alleged Scheme and Equipment Details
Rincker is accused of trading a firearm for a computer, a 3D printer, and funds to build explosive-laden drones, though he later told investigators he had no explosives and was unaware of drone assembly. His role as a facilitator was highlighted by another defendant, Abraham Alvarez, who referred to him as “our manufacturer” in a private chat. Alvarez allegedly provided Rincker with a 3D printer, a shield, night vision goggles, and over $1,000, along with a Mac minicomputer. The equipment was reportedly intended for creating and deploying drones, which the group aimed to use in an attack on the White House event.
“We’re looking at 200-300$/drone if you want this done right,” Falkner allegedly wrote, specifying the need for drones that can’t be remotely jammed and are capable of carrying “at least 12 pounds.”
This statement underscores the meticulous planning involved, with Falkner emphasizing the importance of high-impact materials and reliable technology. The group’s goal was to execute a coordinated attack using these drones, which would have targeted the White House during the UFC event.
Timeline and Preparations
Days before the UFC event, Rincker participated in a private conversation where the group debated the use of drones and snipers. He admitted to sending images of the 3D printer to Alvarez, claiming it was functioning “like a damn champ brother.” Rincker also revealed Alvarez’s intention to attack a FIFA World Cup game in Missouri in early July, though he denied knowing the full plan. The timeline suggests the group had weeks to prepare, with key steps involving the acquisition of materials, training, and testing of the drones.
“From the sounds of everything, that’s probably where this [was] leaning,” Rincker reportedly said, indicating he believed Alvarez might have wanted the drones to carry explosives despite his own initial denials.
This admission adds complexity to the case, as it implies a possible shift in the group’s strategy. The White House event, scheduled for June 22, 2026, was a focal point of their plans, with the potential for significant disruption if the attack had succeeded.
Following the arrests, the Justice Department has intensified its investigation into the group’s activities. Law enforcement sources indicate that the suspects’ communications and movements are being scrutinized to uncover any additional conspirators or evidence of prior attacks. The department has also emphasized the threat posed by the use of drones, which could be difficult to detect and neutralize in a high-profile setting like the White House. As the case progresses, authorities aim to determine the group’s motives and the extent of their preparations.
Lawyers for the defendants have been contacted by CNN to provide further details about the charges and their clients’ involvement. The Justice Department’s focus on this case highlights the growing concern over domestic threats targeting public events. With the arrests of two more individuals, the investigation now includes a broader network of suspects, raising questions about the potential scale of the plot and its implications for national security. The details of the alleged attack remain under review, but the case has already drawn attention to the importance of proactive measures in preventing such incidents.
