Exclusive: Congress discussing affidavits from Epstein survivors about Lesley Groff as survivors told CNN she lied
Congress Explores Lesley Groff's Testimony in Epstein Survivor Affidavits
Survivors Claim Groff Misrepresented Her Role in Epstein's Crimes
Exclusive - The House Oversight Committee is currently reviewing sworn affidavits from survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse, who allege that Lesley Groff, his longtime assistant, provided misleading information during her congressional testimony. This follows reports that several survivors informed CNN they believed Groff had concealed key details about Epstein's criminal activities. Three insiders confirmed to CNN that the committee is actively compiling evidence from survivors to assess the accuracy of Groff’s statements, a development not previously highlighted in the media.
Exclusive evidence is being gathered as part of a broader investigation into Epstein’s operations. Survivors have been asked to scrutinize Groff’s June interview transcript with the committee and highlight any contradictions in her account. House Oversight Chair James Comer, speaking on Exclusive interviews with CNN’s Jake Tapper, stressed the importance of this process: “We need affidavits, sworn affidavits. We’re trying to do this just like any court in America would do.”
“If they lied to Congress, that’s a felony,” Comer stated. “That’s why we’re doing research to see if they lied. It’s all a part of accountability, and that’s the only way Congress can hold anyone responsible.”
This statement underscores the committee’s commitment to uncovering potential falsehoods, with the goal of triggering a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. The focus on Groff’s testimony reflects the growing pressure on lawmakers to ensure transparency in the Epstein case.
Survivors Detail Groff's Involvement in Epstein's Network
Exclusive accounts from survivors suggest that Groff played a central role in managing Epstein’s activities over nearly two decades. During her June testimony, she denied knowledge of the abuse, calling Epstein a “master manipulator and deceiver.” However, survivors have contested this narrative, pointing to instances where Groff directly oversaw interactions with young victims. Lara Blume McGee, who was abused by Epstein from 2001 to 2003, revealed she had met Groff at least twice at Epstein’s townhouse, contradicting her claims of ignorance.
Another survivor, Lisa Phillips, confirmed that Groff was present during their sessions with Epstein. “Of course I’ve met her in person,” Phillips said. “She was there every time.” These firsthand accounts challenge Groff’s testimony and provide critical context for the committee’s review. Marina Lacerda, another survivor, described Groff as actively involved in vetting participants, often asking detailed questions about their age, appearance, and origins. “She even encouraged me to bring my school ID to sessions,” Lacerda added, emphasizing Groff’s presumed awareness of the abuse.
Legal Implications and Committee Actions
Exclusive reports indicate that the committee is now prioritizing survivors’ accounts as the foundation for potential legal action against Groff. Investigators are examining whether her statements align with documented evidence of Epstein’s criminal behavior, including records of underage victims and financial transactions. Sharlene Rochard, a survivor, highlighted that Groff had access to her passport details, making it impossible for her to claim she was unaware of the victims’ ages. “I’m 100 percent sure she knew,” Rochard stated.
An anonymous woman, also a survivor, provided further insight into Groff’s role: “She asked me to leave school early, which was a sign she knew I was a minor.” These details, combined with testimonies from other survivors, are fueling the committee’s inquiry into whether Groff misrepresented her involvement in Epstein’s network. The process of gathering affidavits aims to create a comprehensive record that could be used in future legal proceedings, according to committee sources.
CNN has sought comments from Groff’s legal representatives, but as of now, no response has been received. The ongoing review of her statements highlights the committee’s effort to establish a clear timeline of events and determine if Groff’s actions warrant criminal charges. With Exclusive focus on her testimony, the committee is signaling a deeper dive into the Epstein case, emphasizing the importance of survivor accounts in uncovering the truth.